Difference between Classic vs. LORETA Neurofeedback in Austin, TX

At North Austin Neurofeedback, we want to address a common question that many individuals seeking neurofeedback often ask: What is the difference between classic neurofeedback and LORETA neurofeedback — and which one is better?

If you are searching for neurofeedback in Austin, it’s important to understand that not all training approaches are the same. While both methods use EEG data, the philosophy, application, and style can differ significantly.

Our Approach: QEEG-Driven “Classic” Neurofeedback in North Austin

At North Austin Neurofeedback, we provide traditional 1-2 channel neurofeedback based on the evidence-based principles of operant conditioning and QEEG focal site data. This approach has decades of clinical application and research supporting its effectiveness across concerns such as ADHD, anxiety, trauma, sleep disturbance, and performance optimization.

We begin with a QEEG brain map (quantitative EEG) to identify dysregulation patterns. QEEG brain mapping in Austin allows us to objectively assess brainwave activity and determine which frequencies and cortical sites may be contributing to symptoms.

Classic neurofeedback typically involves amplitude and frequency training at specific areas on the skull (also known as focal sites). We use one- or two-channel training (meaning one or two electrodes placed on the scalp), which keeps the process straightforward and efficient for the brain to interpret. Through audio-visual feedback, the brain is rewarded when it produces healthier, more regulated patterns. Over time, the brain learns how to maintain regulation independently.

Although we train at specific electrode sites, classic neurofeedback works from a global perspective. The brain functions as an interconnected network, and many symptoms stem from dysregulated circuitry rather than a single isolated region. By strengthening core regulatory networks, we often see improvements across attention, emotional stability, sleep, and stress resilience. This is why training at a single site can have widespread influences on overall functioning.

For many individuals seeking neurofeedback therapy in Austin, this global approach of classic neurofeedback leads to broad and sustainable changes.

What Is LORETA Neurofeedback?

LORETA (Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography) is another kind of neurofeedback which involves taking the EEG data and performing an advanced computational method that aims to solve the problem of knowing where in the brain the electrical signal came from. Rather than focusing primarily on surface-level amplitude training, like classic neurofeedback, LORETA uses source localization algorithms to estimate the three-dimensional generators of electrical activity within the cortex.

In other words, it takes standard EEG data and applies math to approximate where signals are most likely originating within cortical regions. Because of this, LORETA is often described as more anatomically precise or localized — even though it relies on the same underlying EEG signal used in classic neurofeedback.

In certain cases, this approach may be considered when more region-specific targeting is desired (aka if a certain structure in the brain is damaged).

However, more localized or location dependent neurofeedback does not necessarily mean more effective.

Many common concerns — including attention difficulties, autism, anxiety, mood instability, and stress-related symptoms — are often associated with broader network or circuitry dysregulation rather than dysfunction in a single isolated region. The brain operates as an interconnected system. When communication across networks becomes inefficient, symptoms emerge.

For this reason, classic neurofeedback is often considered a first-line approach for many common conditions. By supporting global regulation and improving overall network stability, it frequently produces widespread and lasting benefits. This systems-based perspective is why we chose to focus on classic neurofeedback at our clinic.

Which Neurofeedback Approach Is Right for Me?

The answer depends on what is driving your symptoms. However, that is not always easy to determine at the outset.

Because of this, we often recommend starting with classic neurofeedback. It has been studied and applied clinically for decades and has a substantial evidence base supporting its effectiveness in ADHD, anxiety, trauma-related symptoms, epilepsy, and performance enhancement. This means the care you receive at our clinic is grounded in years of clinical application and published research.

LORETA neurofeedback, on the other hand, is a newer development. While promising in certain contexts, it currently has a smaller body of long-term research compared to traditional amplitude and alpha/theta training.

In many cases, we suggest beginning with classic neurofeedback to support global regulation and network stability. If symptoms are not improving as expected, LORETA may be considered as an alternative or adjunctive option, depending on your QEEG findings and clinical presentation.

Interested in exploring QEEG brain mapping or neurofeedback in Austin? Book a consultation call to receive direct, one-on-one guidance from our board-certified neurofeedback provider. 

NorthAustinNeurofeedback.com/scheduling

References:

Coben, R., Hammond, D. C., & Arns, M. (2019). 19 Channel Z-Score and LORETA Neurofeedback: Does the Evidence Support the Hype?. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 44(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-9420-6

Jubair, H., Mehenaz, M., Islam, M. M., & Yeasmin, N. (2025). Neurofeedback: Applications, advancements, and future directions. PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 4(4), e70259. https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70259 

Faridi A, Taremian F, Thatcher RW. Comparative Analysis of LORETA Z Score Neurofeedback and Cognitive Rehabilitation on Quality of Life and Response Inhibition in Individuals with Opioid Addiction. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. 2025;56(2):131-139. doi:10.1177/15500594241283069

Voigt JD, Mosier M and Tendler A (2024) Systematic review and meta-analysis of neurofeedback and its effect on posttraumatic stress disorder. Front. Psychiatry 15:1323485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1323485